Winship wrote: > As to plain ascii last, I have to disagree. It should be done in plain > ascii first as that is what everyone can use and *then* be converted to ... > I know I'm a minority in this, even my wife violently disagrees with me Why would you be in a minority? Plain ascii is obviously the way to go. Why on earth would one NEED the fancy schmancy formatting? It's nice to have it offered so you don't need to go through the file in your word processor and underline this or bold up that or italicize t'other, I suppose, but what you really need is the manual so you can GET it without having to jump through all sorts of hoops. The formatting is the hot fudge sauce and the whipped cream, the sprinkles and the cherry on top. They're nice, but start with the ice cream underneath, let's. Plain vanilla ascii is always nice. > Pete W. says you should start calling me A-Pain-In-The-ASCII, no butts about > it. (sorry Pete, too good not to share.) Ouch. > Douglas Mario Rups [log in to unmask]