On 17 Mar 97, W Schipper wrote: > But if it was, then you'd already know, wouldn't you? It might have > been equally informative to post only the name of the offending spammer, > instead of forcing someone to scroll through all 27 pages until the end > of the message. The person's name was also at the top. But I don't think that was the original spammer, as why would anyone want to get several hundred automated answers? I suspect that the recipient probably was either created or innocent. Perhaps the spam was directed at an individual (the subscriber) or AOL itself. I sure get tired of dealing with the AOL bounces, most of them "mailbox full" Liz ~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~ Liz & the Terv Herd Somewhere on the beautiful Oregon coast Spiritbrook Working Labradors, Siberians, Tervuren John 4:14 ~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~@~~ [log in to unmask] http://www.harborside.com/home/l/lizm