In message <[log in to unmask]>, Brad Knowles writes: > > Describe to me how this relates to "trespass of chattels", > whereby someone is preventing abuse of their property, especially > whereby they are being compelled to pay for the abuse of said > property. Since I'm *not* trying to abuse your property, but merely supply a (free!) service to one of your paying subscribers, you'd think that you'd be a bit more open about this discussion. The bottom line is that I'm trying to send (legitimate) e-mail to one of your customers ([log in to unmask], if it matters), and you're denying it because I happen to be using a local mail relayer to make my network more efficient, and that mail relayer adds itself to the MAIL FROM: address. -- Harald Koch <[log in to unmask]>