Dont forget that ACK only reports the members who are set MAIL and not DIGEST. This fouls many people up :) -- ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ | Michael Loftis -- SYSOP trashcan.nws.net | ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~ On Sun, 1 Jun 1997, George Blake wrote: > >Personally, I've no idea why anyone would WANT ACK any more. Made sense in > >the good ol' days of BITNET and 9600 bps links, but not now. All of my > >lists default to ACK off, REPRO on. I've had VERY few complaints from > >anyone, ever, in seven years. > > > I'm one of those people you have no idea about, Dan.<grin> > I have ACK on all my lists. I like to see the number of subscribers my > messages are going to. Especially on the list I run since it changes daily. > > > > > George Blake, Ph.D. [log in to unmask] > American Association of Psychiatric Technicians, Inc. > Certifying Mental Health Workers Nationwide > For information go to http://www.niia.net/~aapt > > For mental health worker discussion send message to > [log in to unmask] with this in the body > SUBSCRIBE MENTAL-HEALTH-WORKER YourFullNameHere >