Look, your the list owner, so, that means you make the rules for your list. What you can do as a solution to the problem below is to manually subscribe people the way you want them to be subscribed, ie with name and address and all. I am running a list which it had been decided before the development of the list that we wanted to have anonymous e-mail addresses, but real names. So I set the headers on my list to follow that pattern. If I remember correctly, that would be shortHDR, but if you set your list to fullHDR, I thionk you will get what you are looking for. For the record, I do not think it would be prudent to not allow subscribers from a particular sight due to lack of courtesy by others at that site unless yoiu can reasonably say that the problem is widesperead from a number of people from a sight. Maybe there could be a ban list in a future addition of listserv (as opposed to a filter list) which would automatically bounce messages from the addresses of your choosing. The list owner can decipher who sent the messsage and simply decide that people who refuse to play by the rules of the list, (which they agreed to by joining the list) should not be allowed to post to the list. Just an idea. The practicality oif this is not within my knowledge, so if what I have suggested is beyond doing, please ignore it. Glenn BTW, I got a great chuckle from the copied message below. >Maureen LeBlanc <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >>If you post from zippo.com, you need to enter your entire address >>if you want your message to appear in the HWY61-L list and digest. > >>since people are unable to respond. They do not appear in the >>HWY61-L list or digest, or its archives. > >>Again, the solution is to enter your entire address on the >>"from:" line when you are posting from zippo. > >WRONG. The solution is to stop your censorship as you said you would. > >How does it follow that a message that cannot be responded to by email >should "disqualify" the post from being posted to the newsgroup? >What else are you censoring this week?