>Roger Burns wrote: >Can this be taken off of LSTSRV-L? It doesn't apply to any of us. Almost, but not quite. I'm sorry to say there are at least three of us on lstsrv-l with this dreaded disease (CFS or CFIDS). I remember the uproar on cfs-l, but I didn't follow it closely enough to have a real opinion on it. I think Mary was asking for a little objective support here. I don't know who's right and who's wrong, but I'd think there would be room for letting bygones be bygones. (Roger?) Sorry for the diversion. I realize this has little to do with the purpose of lstsrv-l. Laura =+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+=+= Laura Toms, Postmaster/UNIX System Administrator OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc., Dublin, Ohio 1-800-848-5878, x5016 [log in to unmask]