At 12:57 PM 9/15/97 EDT, Stan Horwitz wrote: >On Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:18:18 -0400 Pete Weiss said: >>|I've yet to understand why LISTSERV requires multi-worded names, it seems >>|to cause more trouble than it's worth. >> >>I've yet to have a problem with LISTSERV requiring multi-worded names, and >>that's w/o trying to bypass. >> >>Of course your mileage may vary. > >Yup, YMMV, but for me, the multi-worded names requirement of Listserv has >never been a problem. I have personally been maintaining one list here for >about ten years with an average of 1500 subscribers. As Listserv postmaster >here, I am also indirectly responsible for well over 600 lists and I have >never had a single complaint on this issue. thank you, gentlemen; i am glad to know that you have never encountered this question. for that, i can only say that you are fortunate. i think, however, you will be pleased to know that we have managed to resolve this conundrum in spite of you marvelous support. thank you.