At 12:57 PM 9/15/97 EDT, Stan Horwitz wrote:
>On Mon, 15 Sep 1997 08:18:18 -0400 Pete Weiss said:
>>|I've yet to understand why LISTSERV requires multi-worded names, it seems
>>|to cause more trouble than it's worth.
>>
>>I've yet to have a problem with LISTSERV requiring multi-worded names, and
>>that's w/o trying to bypass.
>>
>>Of course your mileage may vary.
>
>Yup, YMMV,  but for me,  the multi-worded  names requirement of  Listserv has
>never been  a problem. I have  personally been maintaining one  list here for
>about ten years  with an average of 1500 subscribers.  As Listserv postmaster
>here, I  am also indirectly  responsible for well over  600 lists and  I have
>never had a single complaint on this issue.

thank you, gentlemen; i am glad to know that you have never encountered this
question.  for that, i can only say that you are fortunate.

i think, however, you will be pleased to know that we have managed to
resolve this conundrum in spite of you marvelous support.

thank you.