When I click REPLY-TO-SENDER and not REPLY-TO-ALL, it only sends the response to the person. In this case I replied to your message by clicking REPLY-TO-SENDER and it addressed it to you; I then added the list address manually. I think that's probably by design for many lists, but in our case we would like as much communication to take place on the list as possible -- so it can be captured and be available on the web-site search engine. That's why I have the SENDER= keyword. I thought that be making the sending the list (which it's supposed to be anyway), then the reply would default to the list, and reply-to-all would then pick up the other recipients. To do this I think it would have to look like this: FROM: list-address BCC: my-address TO: actual-senders-address which is not the way messages are delivered. Mike ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________ Subject: Re: Changing the order of the Recipients for distributed Author: Adam Bailey <[log in to unmask]> at Internet Date: 1/15/98 5:18 PM On 1/15/98 3:17 PM, Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]> wrote... > Hmmm. So when you recieve my initial message and hit reply, if you > REPLY-TO-SENDER only does that go to me or to the list? The Reply goes to the list, as it's supposed to, so I guess it's not your mailer. However, I share Mr. Weiss' confusion. Your list appears to be configured correctly, as far as I can tell. My only question is: why are you using the Sender Keyword? Are you giving it a value other than the list you're talking about? Otherwise, Sender defaults to the list, and it's not necessary to use that Keyword unless you want your Sender to be something else. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-| "Do not take life too seriously; [log in to unmask] | you will never get out of it alive." [log in to unmask] | - Elbert Hubbard Finger for PGP | http://www.tezcat.com/~adamb