Winship <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >Boils down to what works and what doesn't, and the concientious listowner >does what works< regardless. But the concientious listowner also does his >best, like Maureen Leblanc, to understand how the system he is using and homina homina ... thank you douglas, you're very kind. (now, if i can just think of a way to get this posted to my list and the newsgroup... ) ;- D >LISTSERV work. If LISTSERV won't let you do something, like edit an "ok" >and use the same approval code, YOU figure out how to do it yourself. If >you think the list is of importance, and the edting job is worth the work though i've never edited a post and posted it as being from the original sender (it'd cause a bit of a ruckus out on rec.music.dylan and hwy61-l...) i can understand the need to do that on some lists. but it's one of those things that you just have to figure out a way to do, if you really want to do it. >involved, you do it. And you don't moan and groan about it, other than >occaisional "hey, Eric, could you do this?". oh ... thanks for reminding me ... hey Eric, could you set up listserv to spit out a silver dollar at me each time i approve a post? i'm pretty sure it'd be a real popular feature and look forward to it's implementation. thanks. :-) >The listowner does whatever is required to keep the list functioning >properly, regardles of how long it takes or how convenient it is, and and that's the truth. maureen "the rovin' gambler he was very bored tryin' to create a next world war he found a promoter who nearly fell on the floor said i've never been involved in this kind of thing before but yes I think it can be very easily done we'll just put some bleachers out in the sun and have it out on highway 61!" (b.dylan)