Hi Pete, Thank you for your response. Actually, not all the owners want to be on NOTIFY, hence my problem, but it's good to know that OWNERS means all non-quiet. Secondly, we've already established the rest of the list, and it's been going for quite some time. I only mentioned the moderator thing as info. I know that review has nothing to do with notify. Sorry that you thought I didn't. We already have the situation where all the moderators get all the review posts and any one of them has the chance to ok. Because most of our moderators and owner/moderators are in different time zones, it seems to work fine. So, my questions still remain... how many individual eMail addresses can be one on the one line of the NOTIFY command (I probably need to put 4 or 5 there), and if there can only be two or three (for example) can there be more than one NOTIFY command? My question stems from my looking at other areas of the header and in all the OWNER lines (and similar), only two eMail addresses appear on each of these lines. I wondered if this was done for neatness or because of LISTSERV restrictions. (I didn't set up the list header.) Regards... Susi Edwards Sydney, Australia [log in to unmask] -----Original Message----- From: Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]> >* NOTIFY= OWNERS might be what you want -- it sends the notifications to >all NON-quiet owners. > >BTW, NOTIFY= need not specify a userid@node that is an owner. It can be >any RFC822 address. NOTIFY= has nothing to do with REVIEW. Review would >relate more to EDITOR= and/or MODERATOR=, though if you don't have an >EDITOR=, I believe it defaults to the first non-quiet owner. OK >"cookies" are generated on a per editor/moderator basis and the cookie is >not shared i.e., if we share co-moderation and if the REVIEW output went >to me for an 'OK nnnnnn' confirmation, I could not ask my co-moderator to >do the OK. There is a special case when ALL moderators get a chance to >do the OK though. > >The list-owners' manual will do this more justice than I can here.