On Dec 9, 4:46pm, Deborah Cresswell wrote: } The problem is that when a post comes through to them and they hit REPLY } to respond, this should (in theory) go back to the list and not the } original sender! This does not happen, their responses go back to the } original sender and not the listname. } I have set up the list header as... } } * REPLY-to= LISTNAME I don't think thats a valid value for Reply-to=. Try: * Reply-to= list,ignore And look at the full headers of a post to see if a reply-to: is there, and where its pointing to. Does lotus notes generate a reply-to: in its header? The default for * Reply-to= is list, respect which means that if a Reply-to: is in the header of an incoming message, it will be in the outgoing message. List,ignore says to put in a Reply-to: pointing to the list no matter what was in the incoming message. -- Rich Greenberg Work: PM0RMG atsign WSPVM1.worldspan.com +1 770-563-6656 N6LRT Marietta, GA, USA Play: richgr atsign netcom.com +1 770-321-6507 Eastern time. I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67 Canines:Val(Chinook,CGC,TT),Red(Husky,(RIP)),Shasta(Husky,TT) Owner:Chinook-L Atlanta Siberian Husky Rescue. Adopt a homeless Husky. Asst Owner:Sibernet-L