I noticed lots of these in the LISTSERV queue when I realized LISTSERV seemed rather slow. I SERVEd the address OFF and suggest everyone do the same and be on the lookout for this garbage -- it's a potentially serious issue! Bill >Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> >Received: from CUNYVM (NJE origin SMTP5@CUNYVM) by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (LMail > V1.2c/1.8c) with BSMTP id 6821; Tue, 1 Dec 1998 03:22:44 -0500 >Received: from listserv.cuny.edu 128.228.100.10 by CUNYVM.CUNY.EDU (IBM VM > SMTP V2R4a) via TCP with SMTP ; Tue, 01 Dec 1998 03:22:42 EST >Received: from minerva.ibernet.es (minerva.ttd.net) by listserv.cuny.edu (LSMTP > > for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Tue, 1 Dec > 1998 3:25:40 -0500 >Received: from iname.com (p2h204.anit.es 195.76.122.204 ) > by minerva.ibernet.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA16592; > Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:18:38 +0100 (MET) >Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 09:18:38 +0100 (MET) >Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]> >From: <[log in to unmask]> >To: <[log in to unmask]> >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > >help >info >help >info repeated for 5499 lines!