Who needs a law? How about a listowner option? Delete everything following ----. Seems simple to me, you do it or not - your choice. After all, it is not like listowners don't decide any other parameters. I would do it in a minute on my lists. At 04:17 PM 2/21/99 +0100, you wrote: >Message from Michael S. Johnson [06:34 99-02-21 ]: > > >>Relating this by analogy to law: a recent news report exposed general >>ignorance of a 20-year old law that requires motorists in Washington State >>to carry a trash receptacle. Rhetorical question: Does that ignorance >>mean that the law should not be followed? >> >>Of course, no one has given evidence that there is a "law"/RFC about "-- >>", so the analogy is imperfect. Suggestion: why not propose it as a *new* >>RFC? > >Yes, the analogy was not perfect because we do not have any >law or even a recommendation concerning signatures. > >The idea of standardization of sigs is a good one. > >mjw