In article <[log in to unmask]>, Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >I'm not subscribed to WEBTV, and my mail via PLUM was 8 hrs late this >a.m. Others not on WEBTV and not located at PSU.EDU are commenting likewise. > >Whatever problems WEBTV may or may not have is not what I was >specifically commenting on, but they delay that was (and perhaps is?) >occurred. Subscribers from multiple domains to my mailing list <[log in to unmask]> are also complaining of delays of eight hours or more. Unless I'm misinterpreting them, mail headers suggest the delay is occurring at L-Soft. >Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]> >Received: from mx02.mail.gol.com (mx02.mail.gol.com [203.216.5.22]) > by gol1.gol.com (8.9.2/8.9.2/892-LEGACY-P) with ESMTP id PAA04861; > Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:46:09 +0900 (JST) >Received: from VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (vms.dc.lsoft.com [209.119.1.27]) > by mx02.mail.gol.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/893-MX-P) with ESMTP id PAA15990; > Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:45:45 +0900 (JST) >Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by VMS.DC.LSOFT.COM (LSMTP for > OpenVMS v1.1a) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 5 Mar 1999 1:39 >:30 -0500 >Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP > release 1.8d) with spool id 36377173 for > [log in to unmask]; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:46:06 -0500 >Received: from 207.115.153.32 by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0d) with > TCP; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 17:46:05 -0500 >Received: from james (1Cust23.tnt1.sfo3.da.uu.net [153.36.254.23]) by > mail1.gte.net with SMTP id QAA14024 for > <[log in to unmask]>; Thu, 4 Mar 1999 16:44:21 -0600 (CST) > -- _____________________________________________________________________________ Dan Kanagy PGP key ID: 0xAB08C3F1 [log in to unmask] Tokyo, Japan [log in to unmask]