>> Also, how do I set it up to reply only to the list, so that copying the >> poster is a manual option for the replying party? > > >That would be Reply-to:= list but you are still at the mercy of >the individual subscriber's mail system. > >Welcome to the club, but be aware that long term listownership and >retention of sanity may be incompatible. > >Douglas I am using a mail system from the dark ages, so incompatibility is usually the norm for me. That said, if a reply-to header is sent along with an e-mail message, it will be happily ignored by my mail program. My mail system seems to default to replying to the contents of the From field, which for a list will always be the list address. I believe that any "non-conforming" mail program will treat this problem in the same way. To get such results for those programs which do conform, you'll want something like reply-to=List, Ignore BTW, doesn't reply-to for LISTSERV default to list, respect, and if not, what happens when you leave out the second parameter like Douglas did in his example here? Glenn -- One who refuses to speak has refused to have a voice. One who refuses to have a voice will surely be forgotten. And one who has been forgotten is never allowed to speak. Glenn Alperin [log in to unmask]