> And I hope it never does. If I sent mail to a list and it didn't make it, > and I tried to figure it out, spent hours trying to track down my "email > problems" only to find out that it was a subscription setting that was > hidden from me, I would be extremely irritated. People should know where > they stand. You make two super good points here. > If someone is such a troublemaker that letting them know they > are on review is apt to get them making more trouble, then they deserve > the DELETE command and the Filter= keyword, not the REVIEW setting. I agree with you Francoise .. and often REVIEW is used for newbies to the list or to computers until they "get" how to use their email programs and a list.. not just because the listowner thinks they are a troublemaker. I've co-owned and owned lists with a lot of subscribers so far and can't think of one instance where REVIEW would have been worth spit if they didn't know they were on review anyway, why, and why a post isn't approved ... nor am I so arrogant that I wouldn't invite subscribers to argue their case either - I have been known to be wrong now and then ;-) ...Cleo [log in to unmask]