On 7/21/99 7:15 AM, Stan Ryckman <[log in to unmask]> wrote... >>2: Why not "Set <listname> NOMAIL"? That's what it's there for. > >And why shouldn't that be confirmed? If person A dislikes person B, >this can be forged just as easily as an UNSUB. NOMAIL isn't so destructive. You don't lose all your settings, your subscription date, and non-moderated status (if applicable). And you don't have to go through a hassle (more confirmations) to start receiving mail again. Admittedly, if someone wants to cause trouble for someone else, they're gonna do it. It's simple a matter of where you want to draw the line. -- Adam Bailey | Chicago, Illinois [log in to unmask] | Finger/Web for PGP [log in to unmask] | http://www.lull.org/adam/