On 26 Aug 99, at 13:29, Pete Weiss wrote: >It isn't necessarily a needless feature per se, BUT in the scheme of the >universe of LISTSERV-features, it may be of much lower priority that some >would then translate to the same value as 'needless.' Therefore, a A related discussion of setting a Primary-owner has been discussed here before. Specifically, SJU has had list piracy issues but accepts that this may not be a practical use of LSoft's resources. A hypothetical factor might be the, uh, future utility of a feature. My SWAG is that an increasing percentage of lists are going to be based on home PC's where the primary owner is also the (24 x 7cable connected) PC's Listmaster. We're hopeful that a lot of these issues will just go away in this "One Ranger for one riotER" scenario. -Kary