On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Liz Marr wrote: > On 29 Nov 99, at 0:43, Winship wrote: > > *that* address in the Editor= line. If it is merely an address > > subsumed in ,(listname) it will not override REVIEW. > Then that brings me back to my original question -- how in tarnation did > those message get to the list when none of the listowners were > approving them? (we were all seeing them) Here are the list settings: Ok, Liz. You are using Send= editor,hold and Editor= your@address,(yourlist) then a slew of "moderators." Never having tried it I can not tell you what Send= Editor,hold plus lots of "moderators" will do, from my experience. As a test, you might change it to simply Send= Editor leaving your Editor= alone and see what happens. By the way, is that double comma in Digest= intentional ? Oh, and my understanding is that Digest= Yes,Same means use the settings of Notebook= , but you have Notebook= No so there is no "same" to refer to and your Digest ought not work, by my understanding. Does your Digest work? Douglas > * Reply-to= Sender,Ignore > * Files= No > * Validate= No > * Ack= No > * Auto-Delete= Yes,Semi-Auto,Delay(3),Max(10) > * Review= Owners > * Stats= Normal > * daily-threshold= 500 > * Digest=Yes,same,Monthly,,Size(600) > * Sizelim= 200 > * Notebook= No > * Default-options= shortb,repro,nomime > * Renewal= 3-Monthly,probe > * Loopcheck= None > * .hh on > * Errors-to= [log in to unmask] (Liz) > * Editor= [log in to unmask],(FIBROM-L) > * Moderator= ALL,[log in to unmask] (Liz) > * Moderator= [log in to unmask] (Joyce) > * Moderator= [log in to unmask] (Rene) > * Moderator= [log in to unmask] (Chip) > <rest snipped as nonessential>