Sender: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2002 12:19:45 +0100 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
--On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:41:33 -0800 "Ahern, Shannon"
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> A is preferred, but I think we are looking at B.
>
> Thank you!
>
> Shannon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Good, Donald [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 12:22 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Some technical help with outgoing listmail, please? (sent
> to listowners and siteowners lists)
>
>
> Are you saying that (A) you want to install LSMTP on the Listserv box or
> are you saying that (B) the Listserv box already has an SMTP service and
> you want it to handle Listserv delivery?
I do believe that you mentioned that you had a LSMTP license in-house. If
at all possible, use it. Microsoft still hasn't got out of the X/400 world,
as the Exchange system shows.
While I do not use neither LSMTP nor NT for my Listserv (but Sendmail &
Solaris), I have much greater respect for L-Soft SMTP products than for
Microsofts attempts in that direction.
Regards,
--
Måns Nilsson Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204 KTHNOC MN1334-RIPE
We're sysadmins. To us, data is a protocol-overhead.
|
|
|