Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 15:53:23 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 02:31 08/19/2002 Monday, Michael Shannon wrote:
>>
>> SEND= PRIVATE
>> DEFAULT-OPTIONS= NOPOST,REVIEW
>> EDITOR= primary_poster,secondary_posters
>> MODERATORS= ALL,primary_poster,secondary_posters
>>
>> SET listname POST FOR primary_poster
>> SET listname POST FOR secondary_posters
>>
>> Thus authorized posters would be in REVIEW mode and sent to all
>> moderators, any of whom could approve.
>>
>
>To further decrease the chance of an outsider posting, wouldn't it be better
>to set SEND= EDITOR, HOLD? If I read the 1.8d manual correctly, it appears
>that having moderators will force LISTSERV to send all pending approvals to
>the Moderator addresses and not just to the first-listed editor.
In further testing the options, it appears that the ones I have selected
work just like I want. And though I do not recall if I explicitly stated
it, I wanted all postings from the content providors to be approved by
any of the listed moderators. The added advantage of the options
selected is that non-authorized posters are bounced.
/Pete
|
|
|