|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Oct 2002 14:04:40 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
This has happened to me, as well, because my lists are for developers.
Someone was sending a code snippet back and forth. It was amusing (kind
of ;-) ).
Shannon
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Shannon Ahern
DevelopMentor
www.develop.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
There are only 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand
binary, and those who don't.
-----Original Message-----
From: Warhurst, SI (Spencer) [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 18, 2002 1:05 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: OK on first line of post.
Yes, that also happens if you start a message with:
//
It was a freak incident, but it did happen! :)
--
Spencer Warhurst
Listserv Service Manager
JISCmail -> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk
Mailtalk -> http://www.mailtalk.ac.uk
> -----Original Message-----
> From: FEAT [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 17 October 2002 17:16
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: OK on first line of post.
>
>
> I have a subscriber that is complaining because they have posts
> rejected as commands - because of a tendency to respond to posts with
> OK as the first line of the reply (stand alone). Questions:
>
> 1) Has the logic to sense commands been revised under 1.8e to include
> a check for OK?
> 2) What is the rule that triggers this case
> 3) Can the rule be changed to contain a bit more logic, to avoid this
> situation?
>
> One might think that it is simply an education issue with this user,
> but I think it is reasonable to start the reply to a post with "OK",
> it might even be the entire message.
>
> Michael McIntire
>
|
|
|