|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Apr 2004 21:30:43 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
<Pine.GSO.4.44.0404082011070.19167-100000@infinity> |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Winship wrote:
>
>Because my subscribers don't like addresses with no names attached.
>They don't like dealing with programs or addresses, they want to deal
>with people. An address with no name looks, to them, like something
>will be rerouted here or there, and they don't want that, they want the
>person to whom they send the mail to answer, and want to know who that
>person is, in advance.
If your organization runs a modern network, there's the option of
setting up your postmaster address in the format
[log in to unmask] which isn't perfect, but it does put
a name behind an email address.
|
|
|