Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jun 2004 12:22:06 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
We have no problems, some of our weekly archive files are over 512MB, and
they index ok.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Verity" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 11:47 AM
Subject: Yearly v.s. monthly historical archives
> For most our our lists, I keep archives for just a short period of
> time, typically less than a year. But a few are archived forever.
> Currently the old archives are monthly, so each year has 12 files. I
> suspect people might visually browse recent archives but might only
> search older archives with the web or email tools. What would the
> pros and cons be for creating yearly files for past years?
>
> Some pros the come to mind are:
>
> * Fewer files on the server.
> * Shorter screens on the archive web pages.
>
> A con might be:
> * Larger files on the server
> * Server might balk at indexing large yearly files.
> --
> Cheerfulness is contagious, but don't wait to catch it from others.
> Be a "carrier".
>
> Bill Verity - 814-865-4758 Fax: 814-863-7049
> 215A Computer Building - Information Technology Services, Penn State
University
> At the office - on my Mac, of course ;-)
>
>
> Inbound Mail Scanned by Mcafee Web Appliance.
OutBound Mail Scanned by Mcafee Web Appliance.
|
|
|