At 11:22 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>On 2 Sep 2004 at 11:05, Pete Weiss wrote:
>
>> At 10:32 09/02/2004 Thursday, [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>
>> >*
>> >* The Nameless Coffee House Mailing List
>> >*
>> >* [log in to unmask] (Maureen Leblanc)
>> >* Owner= Quiet: ,[log in to unmask],[log in to unmask]
>> >* Owner= [log in to unmask] (George LeBlanc)
>> >* Review= Owners
>> >* Subscription= Open
>> >* Send= Owners
>> >* Ack= Yes
>> >* Files= No
>> >* Mail-Via= DIST2
>> >* Notebook= No
>> >* Notify= Yes
>> >* Renewal= Yearly
>> >* Default-Options= Repro, Review
>> >* Editor= Owner
>> >* Stats= Normal, Private
>> >* Topics= STAFF, ANNOUNCE, PERFOFRMERS
>> >* Default-Topics= ANNOUNCE
>> >* X-Tags= Yes
>> >* Auto-Delete= Yes,Full-Auto,Delay(1),Max(25)
>> >* Created 1998/08
>> End Reply
>>
>Actually, I'd also deleted a couple of extraneous header keywords
>and re-put the header:
>default-options= review seemed to not be necessary, what with
>send= owners being defined! Editor= owner also seemed
>unnecessary with send= owner in place.
Depending on your needs, posters'/owners' email addresses can be spoofed
by virii/spammers. It happens. Thus if you encounter that problem, you
may re-think the "approval" process.
>Also updated the spelling of "performers" in the header pete!
>Thanks!
I had "anxiety" ;-)
>Will updating and re-putting the header with subscription=
>Subscription= Open,Confirm do it, do you think? That seems to be
>fairly protective of everyone.
|