Sure.....here are all the header lines...
  John

Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
Received: from woodchuck.uvm.edu (woodchuck.uvm.edu [132.198.101.174])
        by penguin1.uvm.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9TItXak027420;
        Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:33 -0400
Received: from eagle.uvm.edu (eagle.uvm.edu [132.198.101.203])
        by woodchuck.uvm.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9TItTQi018056;
        Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:29 -0400
        (envelope-from [log in to unmask])
Received: from list.uvm.edu (raccoon.uvm.edu [132.198.101.191])
        by eagle.uvm.edu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i9TIicZt015728;
        Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:29 -0400
Received: from LIST.UVM.EDU by LIST.UVM.EDU (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with
          spool id 450812 for [log in to unmask]; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:28  -0400
Precedence: bulk
Received: from groundhog.uvm.edu (groundhog.uvm.edu [132.198.101.185]) by
          list.uvm.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i9TItSJc005681 for
          <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:28 -0400
Received: from jmnet21 ([211.244.156.249]) by groundhog.uvm.edu
          (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id i9TItQqe008387 for
          <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:55:27 -0400
          (envelope-from [log in to unmask])
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
              boundary="----=_NextPart_D65_FD642471.D219711B"
X-Priority: 2
X-Mailer: IXQ Mailer Version 3.32
Message-ID:  <059a01c4bde8$f0a37321$59b63a93@jmnet21>
Date:         Sat, 30 Oct 2004 03:49:12 +0900
Reply-To: CIT staff discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
Sender: CIT staff discussion list <[log in to unmask]>
From: "Ashlyn J. Nadeau" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: She will love you for this.
To: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:


On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 [log in to unmask] wrote:

> On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:53:38 EST, John Ryder said:
> > Here's a partial mail header, with valid From and To lines:
> >
> > Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 03:49:12 +0900
> > From: Ashlyn J. Nadeau <[log in to unmask]>
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: She will love you for this.
> > Parts/Attachments:
>
> Umm.. Could we please see *ALL* the header lines (in particular, the Received:
> headers)?  It's quite possible that this message never went anywhere *near*
> the Listserv - it was dumped directly into your mailbox with forged from/to....
>