|
Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:45:36 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Pete Weiss wrote:
>At 10:27 6/10/2005 Friday, Patrick B. O'Brien wrote:
>
>
>>Send your list@server_name an email. In the body say free list_name.
>>
>>
>
>Also, make sure you observe any new messages (probably sent to list-owner and/or -admin) that may result whne the FREE is issued or soon thereaferr.
>
>Typically, a list-owner has:
>
>1) explicitly held the list (why?)
>
>2) implcitly held the list by GET the list definition headers
>
>or
>
>3) LISTSERV has a problem often related to archive storage
>
>
>
>
Yup. We find the most common problem is the list creator mis-spelling
the archive notebook name when the list is set up. As a result, just
FREE'ing the list is no good and you'll have to correct the underlying
error. Otherwise the list will just be held again on the next posting.
Scotty
|
|
|