|
Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:52:58 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Reply-To: |
|
I think this is working as designed, but the documentation is not as clear
as I would like.
The question involves access levels and super lists.
I have a super list, call it SUPER-L, that has sub-lists SUB1-L and SUB2-l,
plus it has members directly subscribed to it.
The SUPER-L list has
Send=Editor,hold
Editor= user@node,(SUPER-L),(OTHER-L)
sub-lists= SUB1-L,SUB2-L
The doc defines:
Editor= net-address1,net-address2|access-level1,...
and under access-level is this type
(listname) Only the subscribers of the named list have access to
the information.
Email from people directly subscribed to SUPER-L are immediately sent and
not modertated, but email from people subscribed via one of the SUBx-L lists
are moderated. Since the people are not directly subscribed to the "named"
list, but to a sub-list, I suspect that this is the reason, but is it the
desired result?
/ahw
|
|
|