So this would mean a configuration issue with Securence? Can header that be suppressed on their end?
Regards,
Randy Klumph
The National Consortium on Deaf-Blindness
The Teaching Research Institute
Western Oregon University
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, February 26, 2009 3:18 pm
Subject: Re: [LSTSRV-L] Securence antispam service
To: [log in to unmask]
> At 02:35 PM 2/26/2009 -0800, Randy Klumph wrote:
> >Resent-from: [log in to unmask]
>
> That's what's causing the problem.
>
> Nathan