Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:29:06 -0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Pete,
By allowing HTML does that mean people can embed code in
their messages that will then point to a photo, which will
then be embedded? What other benefits are their to allowing
attachments and HTML?
Does L-Soft have some documents that will tutor someone (me)
in adding these features?
Thanks,
Ron
--- On Mon, 11/23/09, Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> From: Pete Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: HTML & Attachments question
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Date: Monday, November 23, 2009, 1:47 PM
> At 15:28 11/23/2009 Monday, Ron
> Beatteay wrote:
> > I've run L-Soft in plain text for years,, but I'm
> interested
> > in what are the pros and cons of allowing html and
> attachments.
> > Would subsribers be able to add photos to their
> posts,, for
> > instance?
>
> I've run lists for a couple of decades that disallow
> attachments (well maybe 1.5 decades)
>
>
> * Attachments= NO,filter
>
> but allow HTML.
>
> I've not heard of any viruses being distributed in that
> mode of operation.
>
> Having said that, I've increased SIZELIM= 500 (had been
> 250).
>
> Few complaints.
>
> YMMV.
>
> /Pete
>
|
|
|