Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:37:06 -0500
|
On: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:02:40PM -0800,Eckstine, Nate Wrote:
} The encoding and decoding of the email is probably the difference. I discourage people from using the digest format unless they are brave enough to manage their email client and accept the consequences.
}
} But if someone is digesting the mail and they receive garbage I adjust them to another format until one works, if all have problems they need a different email client.
}
} IMO when you digest emails out to the internet you will end up managing the person's desktop for them. It's not feasible in a large organization. I don't think digesting is well suited to an email client when threaded lists and facebook are alternatives.
Thanks Nate, but some of my readers prefer Digest. I haven't managed
anyones desktop, and have had no complaints about garbage (yet).
--
Rich Greenberg Sarasota, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com + 1 941 378 2097
Eastern time. N6LRT I speak for myself & my dogs only. VM'er since CP-67
Canines: Val,Red,Shasta,Zero,Casey & Cinnar (At the bridge) Owner:Chinook-L
Canines: Red & Max (Siberians) Retired at the beach Asst Owner:Sibernet-L
############################
To unsubscribe from the LSTSRV-L list:
write to: mailto:[log in to unmask]
or click the following link:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=LSTSRV-L&A=1
|
|
|