LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Parts/Attachments: text/plain (14 lines)
Print Reply
Sender:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Subject:
From:
Nick Laflamme <DPL1646@IRISHVM>
Date:
Thu, 12 Feb 87 14:24:13 EST
In-Reply-To:
Message of Thu, 12 Feb 1987 18:32 SET from <ERIC@FRECP11>
Reply-To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@EB0UB011>
Would this make any sense:
 
A user asks a peer (not the one s/he normally uses) for a privledge
(such as a notebook or to do a send).  The peer establishes that the
user is not a local user *and should not be* (ie, a subscribe would
be passed to another peer).  The peer then asks the "right" peer if the
user is a subscriber there.  If a negative reply comes back or no
reply comes back, the privledge is denied.
 
This could be incredibly messy, especially as the distance between
peers increases.  Conceptually, simple, practically, Pandora's box?
 
Nick

ATOM RSS1 RSS2