Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTSRV-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTSRV-L Archives

LISTSERV Site Administrators' Forum

LSTSRV-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTSRV-L Home LSTSRV-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: DIST question
From:
Ross Patterson <A024012@RUTVM1>
Reply To:
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN>
Date:
Mon, 16 Nov 87 10:14:26 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Jim,
 
    LISTSERV  obeys  the :FFORMAT  tag  for  any files  it  generates.
However,  for  DISTRIBUTE,  it   doesn't  generate  the  file,  simply
propagates it.   LISTSERV makes  no assumptions  about the  content or
format  of a  file  sent by  DISTRIBUTE (except  when  using the  MAIL
option).  What you're seeing is a  case where the person composing the
DISTRIBUTE  job used  SENDFILE  to build  the  file.  Richard  Schafer
(MAIL/MAILBOOK) uses  CARD.  There is  no reason why you  couldn't use
VMSDUMP.  I know of at least one  case of using UUENCODE.  And I might
generate another file format tommorrow, if  I feel up to it.  LISTSERV
can't  be required  to understand  all  of these,  because threr  will
always be another.
 
Ross

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV