Sender: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
Subject: |
|
From: |
"Geert K. Marien" <GKM$FAID@QUEENS> |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 88 23:34:48 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Thu, 7 Jan 88 11:22:46 CST from <PHIL@UIUCVMD> |
Reply-To: |
The Revised LISTSERV Distribution List <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Most requests I have seen that end up being sent to the list when they
are supposed to be sent to the LISTSERV by the user, that is, the junk
we are talking about, is not 1 line, often just one line in the header
and also often a combination of the two. Eric makes a sound argument
against the scanning. I agree.
I must say that I, as much, if not more, would like to see a way to scan
and eliminate the junk that ends up going out over some lists, but unless
a really rational manner (read that zero increase in overhead) can be
found, it is just not pratical.
/Geert
|
|
|