Subject: | |
From: | Xavier Millet <ZCCBXMP@EB0UB011> |
Reply To: | Revised LISTSERV forum <LSTSRV-L@DEARN> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Dec 88 10:50:43 HOE |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>By chance I got a copy of Jose Maria's note LISTSEND V1.1
>and I there is a need to make some corrections:
>
Sorry mister Birkenbihl read carefully the objective of this list (do
you Know how to do that ?, if not let me know I will send you a copy of
the Primer's Guide we give our users here) If you had done that You will
have seen you are completely out of FOCUS.
If you were used to read trough several list you will be completely feed
up of the stupidity of people using lists for things they are not
supposed to be.
Please think about it, maybe in ETHIC-L, LICENSE, POLICY-L, GGUIDE or
even in LIAISON among others. But if your intention was to do a
personnel disqualification then of course there are no rules, go ahead.
Are you paid for doing that ? Or is it a voluntaristic attitude ?
Anyway I can imagine lots of list's names (KOMAND-L, APULLO-L, SS-L,
NACIS-L, where you will have had much more audience and agreament.
Xavier
>1. Jose Maria is not an EARN volunteer! It is his Job to
> contribute to the operation and development of EARN and DFN.
> He is paid for this by GMD.
>
>2. Although GMD isn't allways in favour of EARN decissions
> GMD does not not support any strategy of imposing pressure
> on the EARN administration by selectively distributing
> technical solutions everywhere but within EARN. This is not
> a way to improove EARN, it is destructive.
>
>3. Since Jose Maria is employed by GMD and since the developments
> he announced where on base of GMD-owned ressources he is not
> authorized to give any statements on the availability. This
> is especially true for strange and unjustified statements that
> do not agree to GMD policy.
>
>So the best thing to do for now is to ignore Jose Maria's quoted
>paragraph. I guess better news are to follow when Jose Maria is
>back from hollidays.
>
>Klaus Birkenbihl
|
|
|