Eric Thomas <ERIC@LEPICS>
Thu, 26 Oct 89 14:00:00 GMT
|
>take it easy - it's a typo. When I talked about it at nog, you bet that
>I did not say that they were taken out entirely from the p.n. file.
Ok, let's forget about this typo and do as if the minutes had said "have
been removed from the backbone". Now, both Christian and myself asked a
very precise question, if I remember correctly. The minutes went on to
say that this removal was causing problems, and the proposed text of the
question the EARN Executive was to ask the BITNET BoT said that this was
causing unnecessary remedial work for the personnel of the server sites.
Now, for the sake of the operation of this network, I am asking again for
a description of the nature of these alleged problems, and of the
unacceptable remedial work in question. I believe I have described with
enough accuracy the problems that were caused by the 3 sites in question
having outdated tables (if not, I can give more details). If the removal
that solved these problems is indeed causing more serious problems than
the ones it solved, I need to know which ones and why, in order to avoid
worsening the situation of the network in the future, should this happens
again.
If the person who mentioned these "problems" during the meeting did so
just for the sake of dramatizing the situation, when in fact these
problems are only imaginary, I would like him to step forward and to say
so (and I am not even asking for an apology).
Eric
|
|
|