Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 12 Sep 90 00:19:37 O |
In-Reply-To: |
Your message of Tue, 11 Sep 90 13:30:33 EDT |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Any ideas on what's wrong?
That's interesting, I've been trying to find out why, from time to time,
I get mail with two 'Reply-To:' fields and no 'Sender:' field. It was
never quite clear to me whether this was a MAILER, CP or CMS problem, but
it seems that you got the same thing in LISTSERV:
> Output from LSVPUNCH starts on next line.
> 1/line 1 <<<- This duplication doesn't always occur. Sometimes
--> That line should have been the ID line.
> 1/line 1 <<<- the first line is just blank.
> 1/line 2
> 1/line 3
> END/
> Output from LSVPUNCH ends on line above.
Most probable cause: the PUNCHC macro returns control to the application
before getting the channel end from the virtual punch, or before issuing
the SIO (gasp)! The buffer is re-used by the application (for LSVPUNCH
this is definitely the case) and the "wrong" data gets picked up when the
I/O is processed. So I would suspect a CMS bug rather than a CP bug.
Eric
|
|
|