Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | Forum on LISTSERV release 1.7 |
Date: | Tue, 8 Oct 1991 03:22:21 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Mon, 7 Oct 1991 18:32:19 EDT Gary Sponseller <SPONSELL@AKRONVM> said:
>I assume that LSVDIST EXEC should be added to the "cannot be compiled"
>list since lines 921 and 928 use Interpret...
It is obsolete; compile it with the ERASE command (it's free, and it
produces much more compact code than the REXX compiler :-) ).
>Should I just go for all 126?
It all depends on how much storage constrained you are. Writing an EXEC
to LISTFILE LSV* EXEC/XEDIT, exclude the fileids in NOREXXC file and
compile the rest is very easy, so if you don't care about virtual storage
it may be the simplest solution.
>Or should I use the most-often-used EXECs from the results from a CMS
>EXECMAP command on the server console? Currently, I see only 20
>heavily-used EXECs on this map...
These and LSVPROF should definitely be compiled.
>Do very short EXECs matter?
No idea, but you can benchmark it yourself.
Eric
|
|
|