Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTOWN-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTOWN-L Home LSTOWN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Multiple editors
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 31 May 1994 09:04:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I've recently decided to moderate one of my lists after the S/N ration got
absolutely miserable and I received nothing but positive responses from
list members about the idea.
 
However, I don't really wish to have the entire burden of moderating upon
my shoulders alone, and I don't think anybody else does, either. LISTSERV
makes it quite easy to have multiple moderators, but I'd like suggestions
on how to figure out which moderators should approve what. That is, how do
I prevent more than one editor from sending the same note to the list? I
can think of some solutions, but none of them are especially graceful, so
I'd appreciate hearing from those who have already dealt with this problem.
 
And, as a note of clarification: I recently sent LSTOWN-L a Cc: of a form
letter I've created to deal with spammers. Two people have asked me if I
was aware that I had sent that note to LSTOWN-L; yes, I am aware; I
intended that (single) copy to show the members of LSTOWN-L--an appropriate
forum, as best I can tell--how I have decided to deal with the spamming
problem, and to encourage them to do likewise. Perhpas I should have stated
that explicitly instead of relying on people reading the headers; in any
event, I am doing so now. As a couple others have asked, pleave feel free
to use, in any manner you like, the message I sent (write to me for a
copy).
 
Thanks all,
 
b&
 
--
[log in to unmask], Arizona State University School of Music
 net.proselytizing (write for info): Protect your privacy; oppose Clipper.
 Voice concern over proposed Internet pricing schemes. Stamp out spamming.
 Finger [log in to unmask] for PGP 2.3a public key.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV