In article <[log in to unmask]>, Eric Thomas
<[log in to unmask]> says:
>
>On Mon, 29 May 1995 10:31:28 +0200 Herman Van Uytven
><[log in to unmask]> said:
>
>>Listserv seems to reply to the address is the Sender field. This seems
>>not correct to me, although I guess there is a good technical or
>>historical reason.
>
>Why does it seem incorrect? :-)
I thought there was a rule in RFC822 that says:
if there is a reply-to field, reply should go to this address
if there is no reply-to field, reply should go to the sender address
if there is neither a reply-to or a sender field, reply should go to
the from address
So why shouldn't this scheme be followed for mails to the listserv machine ?
-Herman-