Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 2 Aug 1995 14:20:08 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Wed, 2 Aug 1995 11:25:55 CDT David Young said:
>Is there any way to disable a list subscriber from setting the conceal
>option? Would a list exit (defined via the Exit= keyword) help with
>this?
Yes, if you are running 1.8b, there is a SET_REQ entry point available to
your list exit which would allow you to do this. Your exit would need to
examine the SET options being passed one at a time, and, if it encounters
a "CONCEAL", it could, say, change it to NOCONCEAL and return to LISTSERV
with a return code of 2. The return code of 2 means a parameter has been
modified.
The exit could, of course, be nice and send mail back saying that CONCEAL
is not valid for the list, etc. though that is a little more work on your
part.
Bill Gruber
City University of New York Computer Center
|
|
|