Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 1996 21:16:20 EST |
In-Reply-To: |
Message of Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:36:27 -0500 from LISTSERV list
owners' forum < [log in to unmask]> |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 16 Mar 1996 13:36:27 -0500 Philo <[log in to unmask]> said:
>Your reply that even though a large number of listowners wanted it, and
>I only remember seeing two that didn't (which could be solved with a
>switch),
First off, we need to keep things in proportion here. A *small* number of
list owners (say a dozen or so) said they wanted it. An even smaller
number said they did not want it. Thousands of other list owners said
nothing. From this I concluded that this would be a good feature to add
as time permits. However, this is not the only feature that it would be
good to add as time permits. Everything has to be prioritized.
>you told us that you had better things to do with your programming time,
>and we should just deal with it.
No, I said our programming time was currently spent on items with a
higher priority. This doesn't mean it will never get done, but it does
mean it is not going to get done right now.
Eric
|
|
|