Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 12 Mar 1996 10:09:00 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>The enclosed mail file has been identified as a delivery error for list
>>GIRLFRIEND! because it was sent to the reserved 'owner-girlfriend!' mailbox.
>>
>Do you have any insights? With the other user with whom I have his problem
>the message says "user unknown" so perhaps I have part of the address wrong,
>something should be capped that isn't, maybe. With igc., I get "service
>unavailable". I'll try them without the bang at the end of the listname.
What ever the reason for the ORIGINAL bounce, the above '>>' quoted
section is standard LISTSERV jargon saying that the bounce went to
the OWNER-listname address, which IS the correct place for bounces
to go. This "maps" to the list definition keyword operand of
* ERRORS-TO= which typically defaults OWNERS (*), which would be you.
-- co-owner: INFOSYS, TQM-L, CPARK-L, ERAPPA-L, JANITORS, LDBASE-L, et -L
URL:mailto:[log in to unmask] "I've been cybertagged :-("
* my interpretation is somewhat opposed to what I've read in the List-Keyw
doc, but based upon VM/CMS experience.
|
|
|