Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 27 Jun 1996 08:20:07 -0400 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
At 16:40 06/26/96 PDT, Peter Rauch scribed:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 1996 19:06:39 -0400
>> From: Philo <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> So, a simple prefix of some abbreviation would prevent much groaning and
>> complaining.
>
>A more effective longterm solution would be for each of those cc:Mail
>corporate users and corporations to indeed "groan and complain" --loudly,
>to Lotus. Why should the world bend to non-standards-compliant, or
>crippled, or dumbed software?
>Peter
>
Just for the record:
We have cc:Mail in our organization of 600, which has some tough budget
problems. If the mail system "works", why spend $$$$ to replace it?
Especially when you consider it's not just purchase price, but conversion,
installation, and training issues... Tough call- does the company bend to
the will of the (usually a minority) workers, or does LSOFT adjust to suit
its customers (listowners and members)?
Philo
--
======================================================================
Philip B Janus || "Cigarettes are not addictive.
[log in to unmask] || Just don't inhale..."
*2*E GULC <*> || Dole/Clinton '96
http://www.radix.net/~philo ||
======================================================================
|
|
|