Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 17 Aug 1997 16:47:25 -0400 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Aug 1997, Dan Lester wrote:
> Not really. I'm assuming you're smart enough to NOT say on list, or to
> anyone, that [log in to unmask] is set to review. The only person who ever knows
> is the person reviewed, and even then only if they post again. If they
> spread the word about their "pariah" status, that's their business and you
> can cheerfully ignore any discussion about it.
Hi, Dan. It may be that your mail system doesn't show you the
line that says "Approved by:[log in to unmask]", but lots of systems DO,
so LOTS of people can see that so-and-so's postings are subject to review
and deduce from that the person's pariah status (unless there are MANY
people set to REVIEW for many reasons).
Joan Korenman (whose VAX e-mail always shows all headers, and
whose unix e-mail can if desired)
*****************************************************************************
* Joan Korenman [log in to unmask] *
* University of Maryland, Baltimore County *
* Baltimore, MD 21250 http://www.umbc.edu/wmst/ *
* *
* The only person to have everything done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe *
*****************************************************************************
|
|
|