PMFJI, but we would like to have messages from various sendmails
around the world which tell us that mail has not been sent for 4
hours/whatever, trashed.

If (dare I say) LISTSERV could use horrible things like Precedence:
bulk this is one way of ensuring that these messages are never sent by
the originating sendmails. Any other suggestions of methods to combat
this issue will be warmly received.

N.B. We use LSMTP to send out LISTSERV mail.

Thanks.

--
Alan Thew                                       [log in to unmask]
Computing Services,University of Liverpool      Fax: +44 151 794-4442

On Mon, 1 Dec 1997, Pete Weiss wrote:

> It depends.
>
> Can you provide a sample (with all headers) of one of the most frequent kind?
>
> Not all MTA's are compliant with Internet RFCs, upon which LISTSERV(R) was
> designed.
>
> Also, check your AUTO-DELETE= and your ERRORS-TO= keywords.
>
> Finally, some folks have multiple userids in order to separate out
> list-maintenance traffic from the daily grind.
>
> /Pete Weiss
>
> At 18:57 11/30/97 -0500, you wrote:
> |Anyone know how to trim the full text of messages from delivery error
> |messages...? A number of us are tired of choked email accounts.
>