Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 1999 00:31:48 -0400 |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Content-type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>> Also, how do I set it up to reply only to the list, so that copying the
>> poster is a manual option for the replying party?
>
>
>That would be Reply-to:= list but you are still at the mercy of
>the individual subscriber's mail system.
>
>Welcome to the club, but be aware that long term listownership and
>retention of sanity may be incompatible.
>
>Douglas
I am using a mail system from the dark ages, so incompatibility is
usually the norm for me. That said, if a reply-to header is sent along
with an e-mail message, it will be happily ignored by my mail program.
My mail system seems to default to replying to the contents of the
From field, which for a list will always be the list address. I believe
that any "non-conforming" mail program will treat this problem in the
same way. To get such results for those programs which do conform,
you'll want something like reply-to=List, Ignore
BTW, doesn't reply-to for LISTSERV default to list, respect, and if not,
what happens when you leave out the second parameter like Douglas did
in his example here?
Glenn
--
One who refuses to speak has refused to have a voice.
One who refuses to have a voice will surely be forgotten.
And one who has been forgotten is never allowed to speak.
Glenn Alperin
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|