Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 16 Aug 1999 08:56:55 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Anti-spam software w/ its concept of what / where "constitutes" spam, had
decided that either this mail or site falls into that category.
><<< 550 Mail from 206.185.162.193 refused, see http://relays.radparker.com
>554 marie@infohwy.com... Service unavailable
"Baffled" seems like a multi-purpose description that would fit.
At 01:09 08/16/1999 Monday , Pauline M. Marshall wrote:
>I have asked on other listowner lists, to no avail. Can anyone explain
>to me, why this mail is boucing? Does Lsoft relay thru open servers?
>If not, why does the message-id not originate from lsoft? I am usually
>really good at figuring out these errors, but this one has me pretty
>baffled. Thanx.
>
>------- Forwarded Message Follows -------
>Subject: DOG-RESCUE: error report from
SERVER.EMMOTT-WALKER.COM
>
>The enclosed message has been identified as a delivery error for the
>DOG-RESCUE list because it was sent to
>[log in to unmask]
>
>------------------------------ Message in error
-------------------------------
>Received: from server.emmott-walker.com by mango.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for
> Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>;
> Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:06:24 -0400
>Received: from localhost (localhost) by server.emmott-walker.com
> (980427.SGI.8.8.8/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via internal id TAA18854; Fri,
> 13 Aug 1999 19:02:42 -0500 (CDT)
>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:42 -0500 (CDT)
>From: [log in to unmask] (Mail Delivery Subsystem)
>Subject: Returned mail: Service unavailable
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>To: <[log in to unmask]>
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>
>The original message was received at Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
>from demo.lsoft.com [209.119.0.46]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
>[log in to unmask]
> (expanded from: <[log in to unmask]>)
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to mail.infohwy.com.:
>>>> MAIL From:<[log in to unmask]>
><<< 550 Mail from 206.185.162.193 refused, see http://relays.radparker.com
>554 marie@infohwy.com... Service unavailable
>
> ----- Original message follows -----
>
>Received: from mango.ease.lsoft.com (demo.lsoft.com [209.119.0.46]) by
>server.emmott-walker.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id
>TAA18853 for <[log in to unmask]>; Fri, 13 Aug 1999 19:02:06 -0500 (CDT)
>Return-Path: <[log in to unmask]>
>Message-Id: <[log in to unmask]>
>Received: from mango (mango.ease.lsoft.com) by mango.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP
>for Windows NT v1.1b) with SMTP id <[log in to unmask]>; Fri,
>13 Aug 1999 20:05:33 -0400
>Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 20:04:35 -0400
>Reply-To: Dog Rescue <[log in to unmask]>
>Sender: Dog Rescue <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: DOG-RESCUE Digest - 13 Aug 1999 - Special issue (#1999-898)
>To: Recipients of DOG-RESCUE digests <[log in to unmask]>
|
|
|