Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LSTOWN-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LSTOWN-L Archives

LISTSERV List Owners' Forum

LSTOWN-L

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LSTOWN-L Home LSTOWN-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Actual Diskspace used?
From:
Nathan Brindle <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
LISTSERV list owners' forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Apr 1996 14:11:54 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
It isn't an exact thing.  lrecl stands for "Longest Record Length" and
nrecs stands for "Number of Records".  In this case, you can get a
worst-case number by simply multiplying lrecl by nrecs.  For instance,
 
  MYLIST        LOG9512         LOG OWN V      83   655 95/12/27 01:04:08
 
is <no larger than> 83*655 bytes, or 54365 bytes.  This is a legacy from
VM; I don't know if Eric is planning to rewire things so that the non-
VM systems report actual bytes or not.
 
On the other hand, Ben, in your case you can FTP to the server in question
and look at the contents of your directory and get exact byte counts.
The file in question is actually 31186 bytes.  So as you see, the lrecl*
nrecs formula isn't very exact.  :)  The rest of the files are, respectively,
 
LOG9601       59393 bytes
LOG9602       79415   "
LOG9603       77433   "
LOG9604       26331   "
 
Nathan

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.EMAILOGY.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV