Ai yi yi,  what  have  I started?

Douglas Winship  wrote:
>servers at Buffalo.  In my reply [to Jim Serwinowski]I mentioned that some
>on LSTOWN-L were
>unhappy with Catalist at Buffalo and that I had advised them to contact
>him, please watch out for such.

I'm not at all unhappy with Buffalo or Catalist, I was just curious as to
why the reports for the server & the domain were different. AFAIC* there's
no reason at all to complain, listserv@buffalo has been running like a
dream for some time, and AFAIK Catalist is under the control of
L-Soft  anyway. Thanks again for the instructive discussion. I'm signing
off this topic now... --  ed

*as far  as I'm concerned